![]() But keep in mind that none of the eight multi-cookers we tested match the sautéing power of a rangetop. The Duo and the Max both turned out nicely browned sliced onions. If you want to steam veggies, you're better off looking elsewhere in our multi-cooker ratings. Even when we set the cook time to a minute or less, the veggies were overcooked. The Max required 12 minutes to reach pressure, and the Duo took 14 minutes. The veggies turned out mushy and lacking in color. Neither model did a good job cooking our broccoli-and-carrot medley, earning only a Fair rating in our steaming tests, the lowest rating any pressure multi-cooker earned across our performance tests. But we found that both cookers left some rice stuck to the bottom of the pan. The Instant Pot Duo and the Max each cooked 1 cup of white rice in about 20 minutes, start to finish. Both models can slow cook, but you’ll have to give them more time than the competition.īoth cookers turned out rice that was fluffy and moist. Compared with most of the other multi-cookers we tested, the Instant Pot Duo and Max needed more than 5 hours to make beef stew that was tender and ready to eat, and more than 7 hours to serve up chili with tender beans. Carnivores, take note: You’ll save more time cooking certain foods like meat or beans with pressure, but not as much cooking rice, for example, or vegetables.īoth models earn a middle-of-the-road Good rating in slow cooking. When our testers made chili, using dried beans, it finished in about 70 minutes in both the Max and Duo (beans alone normally take at least 2 hours on the stove-after an overnight soak).Īnd we saved about 10 minutes by using the Max on its highest pressure level. Using the Max on its maximum pressure, our ribs were done in about 50 minutes (for comparison, ribs took 2 hours in our oven). Both cookers served up tender ribs in 60 minutes when set to high pressure. the Duo’s 11.6 psi, meaning you can save a little more time using the Max set to its maximum pressure level. The Max increases the pressure to 15 psi (pounds per square inch) vs. But we found some slight differences in performance. ![]() The two multi-cookers performed similarly when we tested each of the cooking functions, earning the same rating in every case. But more importantly, the Max cranks up the pressure, the options-and the price. The 1,100-watt Instant Pot Max boasts 100 more watts than the Duo. “Getting dinner to the table faster is why you buy an Instant Pot, and both models earn an Excellent rating in pressure-cook mode,” says Ginny Lui, CR’s test engineer for countertop cooking appliances.īoth are 6-quart models with a round interior pot that’s made of uncoated stainless. We tested all of these functions, plus some additional features that set the Max apart.Īt the core of these little appliances’ promise? Time-saving pressure cooking. Both are electric pressure cookers with dedicated functions for slow cooking, making rice, steaming, sautéing, making yogurt, and keeping food warm. We recently put eight multi-cookers from a number of brands through their paces, including the Instant Pot Duo60 7-in-1, $100, and the Instant Pot Max, $200. It remains the company’s top seller.īut the Instant Pot brand continues to expand, and now includes 21 models-one of which is WiFi-enabled-and even a blender, the Instant Pot Ace Multi-Use. Following its December 2013 release, the Instant Pot Duo60 7-in-1 multi-cooker became an internet sensation and an Amazon best seller, inspiring cookbook authors-not to mention millions of home cooks-along the way.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |